“Community
Columnist” Michael Schrader
(About denial)
Written 13 October 2016
This past
April, Main Street Port Huron became leaderless with the resignation of its
director. Since that time, there has
been some serious soul-searching about the function and purpose of Main Street,
given that the Downtown Development Authority exists and has some functional
overlap. Surprisingly, Port Huron has
chosen to do the prudent and smart thing, and fold one entity into the other,
with a new part-time director. Downtown,
as it once existed, is dead; however, that does not mean the geographical area
that once was the economic center of the area does not still have value and
importance.
Several
member of the council correctly asked what kind of a person would fill this new
technical position making about one-third of what the City Manager makes. Based on my two plus
decades in the municipal infrastructure/development/planning field, I foresee
one of two possible types of candidates for this job, depending on whether the
city wants someone with technical expertise and vision willing to objectively
assess the current sad state of downtown and give innovative and creative ideas
that may be counter to the city’s preconceived notions of what downtown should
be, or someone to diligently implement these preconceived notions.
If the city
is seeking a bold and cutting edge professional, there
are those who would be willing to take this position and the responsibility
because they are professionals who enjoy the challenge and view the reward not
as monetary but as seeing their vision come to life. These are the kind of
people who will tell you that downtown can never be what it once was. These are the kind of people who will tell
you that as the neighborhood for three major employers, the hospital, the
government buildings, and the college, it can serve them and tie them together;
instead of being a destination for those outside the area, it is a destination
for those already here. These are the kind of people who will tell you that it is time to
get rid of the unneeded traffic signals, and perhaps something a bit
more modern, such as a roundabout or two, will do. These are the kind of people who will tell
you to quit worrying about servicing cars, and start worrying about servicing
people, with state-of-the-art pedestrian facilities connecting these employers
with each other and with the state-of-the-art transit center. These are the people who
are the outsiders who have spent much of their careers outside of Michigan,
bringing fresh approaches.
If the city
is seeking someone to merely implement its existing
and stale preconceived vision for what downtown should be, then it need not
bother to look beyond the cronies and political hacks that fill city hall. To follow orders, one does not need technical
expertise or even experience. If the city already has its mind made up as to what it thinks
downtown should look like, it should save itself a lot of effort and just go
ahead and hire the 16 year old friend of the granddaughter of whatever city
official has a granddaughter has a 16 year old friend looking for a job to be a
good and loyal employee and push the papers exactly as told. It is generally not a wise idea to hire a
professional and then attach the shackles on what he or she really can do; it
is insulting to the professional, a waste of time and money, and does not end
well. The cities that I have known to do
this tend to get a bad reputation among design and
planning professionals as a bad place to work and do business. When you are trying to encourage growth and development, that is not a good reputation to have.
I am trying
to stay optimistic that the city will want someone with true vision, even if it
is not the city’s preconceived one. Unfortunately, based on my few conversations
with city policy makers, I suspect the city will ultimately hire someone
connected with someone already with the city who will do what he or she is
told, no questions asked. Perhaps, just
perhaps, I will be proven wrong.
Back to "The
Fine Print" Index