“Community
Columnist” Michael Schrader
(About intellectual “in-breeding”)
Written 09 September 2015
If you haven’t heard, Port Huron has a “new” planner. I use the word new liberally, because while
there technically is a new person occupying the planner position, I wouldn’t consider the new person actually “new”. The word “new” implies different, and hiring
a local is not different. The same with
Marine City and their recent hire of a “new” city manager. Last year’s hire of a “new” school
superintendent was not really “new” or different.
There is an
old saying that the definition of insanity is doing the exact same thing every
time and expecting different results. We
see this insanity in the world of collegiate and professional sports, where the
same coaches are recycled from team to team with the newer teams expecting a
different result. With a few rare
exceptions, a losing coach at one team will be a losing coach at another
team. While it is noble to want to give
a coach a second chance, typically a bad coach at one team will be a bad coach
at another. Lane Kiffin
is a perfect example. Lane was a failure
as the head coach of the Oakland Raiders, a marginal coach for the Tennessee
Volunteers, and a flop for Southern Cal.
Football fans wondered about the sanity of both Tennessee and Southern
Cal, especially Southern Cal, for hiring someone who had such a dismal record.
In my time
in Michigan, I have heard numerous people talk about the need for improvement
and revitalization, and the need to stem the continuing exodus from the
state. Talk to U-Haul and they will tell
you that people are moving out of Michigan, not in. The exodus is so bad that one-way rental of
trucks and trailers has become quite expensive due to demand exceeding
supply. If no one is moving in, then the
trucks and trailers that are used to move out are
never replaced. As a person with U-Haul
told me, they can’t keep the rental facilities
supplied with enough equipment to keep up with demand.
If officials
in Michigan truly want to reverse the ongoing exodus, then a good place to
start would be with new ideas that attract those not from Michigan to move
here. Unfortunately, it doesn’t seem that local governments really want to reverse
this trend. The best way to get new
ideas that would encourage people from other parts of the country to move here
is to ask a person from outside of Michigan.
Port Huron, Marine City, and the school district missed golden opportunities to truly seek out new ideas that would
attract new people by hiring Michiganders to fill crucial leadership
positions. Drive down the highway and
see how well the “Michigan First” approach has worked. Obviously, the Michigan way is flawed, or
people wouldn’t be leaving the state in droves. Yet hiring “new” people trained and versed in
the Michigan way will somehow reverse this?
One of the
most frustrating things I have observed about Michigan is how closed minded Michigan is.
If one isn’t Michigan born and bred, one is
just second-class. Our flagship
university spends millions of dollars hiring “Michigan Men” to be the football
coach, with the same disastrous results.
. My negative teaching experience
at one of Michigan’s universities consisted of being told by Michigan born and
bred students that any idea from outside Michigan is a bad one. Most of the Michiganders I have met have
never crossed the river. I have been
surprised at the number of Michiganders who rarely, if ever, leave the state.
While being
proud of your state and people is admirable, the lack of willingness to embrace
people and ideas originating outside of your home state, intellectual “in-breeding”,
leads to stagnation and decline. It’s not just Michigan; my home state of Missouri is the
poster child of regression due to intellectual “in-breeding”. As scary as change is, for the sake of
survival of our community, it is time to embrace new people and new ideas.
Back to "The
Fine Print" Index