Archive for January, 2010

A P.O.ed Pimple

Wednesday, January 6th, 2010

Number 4 1/2 was showing his mother, The Missus, a sore in his mouth.  After much deliberation, she declared that it was a canker sore.  Number 5 1/2 was across the room when she said this, and asked if he could see the “Angry Zit”.  How he got “Angry Zit” from “canker sore” I can only conjecture, but it made me wonder how one can tell the difference between an “angry zit” and a “not-angry zit”?  Is the angry zit threatening to erupt all over the other skin cells if they don’t cooperate?  Does its head look like a cliched fist?  What percentage of zits are angry?  Why is it angry?

Aah, too many questions to ponder…..

Aaaahhhh! A Snow Day!

Monday, January 4th, 2010

The kids were supposed to start back to school today.  Key word – SUPPOSED.  The Missus has been looking forward to January 4 and the start of school for the better part of a week.  While she loves all nine children, they can be overwhelming, and after two weeks of Christmas Break, she was looking forward to getting back into a normal routine and having a break from the seven who go to school.  As bad luck would have it, we have had two more snowfalls since the seven inches we got on Christmas Eve, and the temperatures have been subfreezing.  TRANSLATION – it’s been too damned cold to melt the stuff!  The latest two inches fell over the weekend, and being as it was a weekend, the roads did not get cleared; therefore, school was canceled.  They were clearing the county roads while I was driving to work this morning, so, God-willing, the young-ins will be back in school tomorrow.  For the sake of the Missus’ sanity, I hope so!

5990 Days Of Lunacy

Monday, January 4th, 2010

June 1, 2026, is when I plan to retire and move out of Oklahoma.  Until then, I pray that our wonderful Oklahoma Legislature doesn’t take us too far off the deep end.  After reading about some of the new bills that our legislators are proposing, I am keeping my fingers crossed….

The wonderful, delightful, and ever so judgmental Sally Kern, representative from central Oklahoma, has decided that it’s too easy to get a divorce.  In her words, it’s easier to get a divorce than to get a car loan.  Sally believes that couples aren’t doing enough to reconcile.  So, to change that, she is proposing that divorces based on incompatibility not be allowed if the couple has been married over 10 years, have minor children, or one of the spouses objects.  If that had been the law when I got divorced, I’d still be married to someone whom I dislike, I couldn’t trust, and I couldn’t be in the same room with for more than five minutes without getting into a vicious argument.  Sally’s rationale is it is better for the children if the parents stay together.  Ask my kids how good it was for them to be subjected to their parents arguing ad nauseum.  Our constant arguing deeply scarred the children, as they all have issues relating to the breakup and the nastiness that will take many therapy sessions to overcome.  Sometimes reconciliation is not the right answer.  Why should a couple forced to be miserable and stay with someone they flat out do not like?

Sally did say that there would be exceptions made for adultery and abuse.  So, it would take someone getting the living crap beat out of them before they can get a divorce?  If Sally Kern thinks this is such a gerat idea, then someone should beat the living crap of out her.  When you are in a bad relationship, you want to get away – quick!  You don’t want to have to hang around until it is too late, and when you’ve had the living crap beat out of you, that is too late.  As for the adultery?  Well, we now know that my ex committed adultery back in 1992, except I was never able to definitively prove it, and the only people who knew would not admit to it.  In my ex’s case, what incentive would there be to admit to such a transgression knowing that she would lose her gravy train?

Ah, but Sally is not alone in her, well, stupidity.  Another of our erstwhile legislators has decided it is of the utmost importance for the schools to study the Old and New Testaments alongside Shakespeare and Hemingway in literature classes.  If the Bible is “literature”, then why not the Quran?  How about the books that weren’t included in the bible like the Apocryphal Books or the Coptic Gospels?

Yes, this is Oklahoma, where you can lose a VW in the potholes and where the population is barely literate.  But hey, those things are unimportant as long as we live in a Taliban-type Christian state, right?  If, God forbid, these stupid bills become law, you can rename us as Oklahomistan….

Only 5990 days until I retire….