Archive for January, 2010

Two Baptists In A Liquor Store

Friday, January 29th, 2010

Here’s one from the Spitfire I work with (with apologies to my Baptist friends)….

Baptist  Shampoo  


While shopping in a grocery store, two Baptist church ladies happened

to pass by  the beer, wine, and liquor section. One asked the other if she would like a beer.  
The second good Baptist sister answered that, indeed, it would be

very nice to have  one, but that she would feel uncomfortable about purchasing it.  
The first sister replied  that she would handle that without a problem.

She picked up a six-pack and took it to  the cashier.  
The cashier had a surprised look, so the good Baptist sister said,

“This is  for washing our hair.”    


               Without blinking an eye, the cashier reached under the counter

                 and put a  package of pretzel sticks in the bag with the beer.

                                                “The curlers are on me.”

Changes To The URL….Sort Of!

Tuesday, January 26th, 2010

Since I am actively looking for a new job, I am changing things around a little bit.  For the past several years, when you typed in www.t2s2.org, you were taken to the family home page, which had links to all kinds of personal stuff, including my singing, as well as a generic link to my resume and business-related stuff.  In other words, I was emphasizing the personal over the professional.

Since I am now seeking a new job, I am reversing the priority, and emphasizing the professional over the personal.  Now, when you type in www.t2s2.org, it will take you to the index for the business, which has a wealth of information on my professional experience.  There is not a link from the professional site to the personal one; it was only a one-way connection.  Therefore, you will have to remember that the blog is at t2s2.org/blog1.  I will still maintain the links within the blog to the other personal sites, such as “The Fine Print”.  Thanks for your patience and understanding, and have a Smurfy day!

Why You Should Call Your Friendly Civil Engineer Before You Buy

Tuesday, January 26th, 2010

Wouldn’t it be a bummer if you plunk down $250000 for a house and it slides down a hill?

Soil Shift Evacuation

This is a real picture of $250000 houses in San Antonio sliding down a hill!  Of course, as always, the builder is being blamed for this mess by some very ticked off homeowners.  As with all of these types of cases, there will be lawsuits filed on behalf of the innocent homeowners against the evil, greedy home-builder who misled them into buying a house on a lot on the top of a bunch of fill.

What frustrates me about situations like this, and I’ve seen a bunch, is that the homeowner never ever accepts responsibility for his or her own stupidity.  Come on, who in their right mind would buy a house sitting on top of a bunch of fill being held in place by a huge wall?  Yes, there are walls that never fail, but more likely than not, they do fail because retaining walls tend to be built as cheaply as possible.  I speak from experience on this one, having designed 15 to 20 feet walls, only to have my designs spurned because they are “too expensive.”  Not to brag or anything, but good and responsible civil engineers like myself do design things that are built to last, only to be told “thanks, but no thanks.”  I once designed a foundation drainage systems for a homeowner that his contractor called “a Cadillac system”, only to have the homeowner opt against it to save a few dollars.  I’d guarantee that part of the reason that the retaining wall in the picture failed is because the foundation drains were inadequate, if they even existed at all.

Every seller and home-builder should require a home-buyer either get a letter from a registered civil engineer saying that the property has been inspected by an engineer and no deficiencies have been found OR sign an indemnity clause preventing them from suing the seller or builder if something like this happens.  Why should the seller be penalized because the buyer is cheap or lazy?  Remember – CAVEAT EMPTOR.

One For All, And All For Ourselves

Thursday, January 21st, 2010

AFSCME, the union which represents the non-sworn (non police or fire) city employees, conducted a poll yesterday to determine what the membership preferred – a 5.2 percent pay cut, or layoffs of 65 employees.  The results are in, and by a 3 to 1 margin, the membership preferred – layoffs!

I was saddened to hear this, and saddened to hear some of the excuses, such as “a paycut will reduce my pension.”  Well guess what?  Those 65 won’t get a pension.

The union likes to boast about its teamwork, that “we are all in this together.”  Apparently not.  I find it very disheartening that people would prefer to see others lose their jobs than take a pay cut.  Sad.  Very very sad.

Now, instead of knowing that I have a job, but at a reduced salary, I have to stress for the next 24 hours of whether or not I even have a job at all.  I hope you enjoy your retirement!

http://www.tulsaworld.com/news/article.aspx?subjectid=334&articleid=20100121_11_A1_Kathle56984

Bravo, Number 2

Tuesday, January 19th, 2010

With the impending 5 1/2 percent pay cut, my budget is stretched.  Very stretched.  I am now running deficits, and my best estimate is that my savings and lines of credit will run out in about six months.  Compounding the problem is that my lovely ex-wife refuses to live up the financial agreement she agreed to when we got divorced, so I have been forced to cover those expenses as well as my own.   With the salary I had prior to the first 3.1 percent cut due to the furlough days we were forced to take in July 2009, I could cover it.  Since the furlough days, I can’t.  Now I really can’t.

The harsh reality is that by the time I rehire my attorney, redo the agreements based on my lowered salary, and get some enforcement of the agreement, it will be at least a year before I will see any of the monies that my ex is supposed to pay.  While those monies would close my personal budget deficits, given that I can cover the deficits for six months, and I won’t realistically see any funds for a year, I have a real problem.

Given my current financial bind, I was pleasantly surprised when Number 2 handed me her tips on Saturday and told me that I should use it to pay for school lunches, which cost me upwards of $60 a week.  What really bites is that even with my reduced salary of $58000 I am still considered rich by Oklahoma standards and do not qualify for reduced lunches, even with my 11 person household.

I know there are many times that Number 2 frustrates me because she does her own thing and is rarely home with the family.  Nonetheless, it was a very nice gesture, and very helpful, too.  Every little bit helps.  I just wish that my ex can get over her pettiness and live up to her obligations.

What Gives With This Class Envy Crap?

Wednesday, January 13th, 2010

All of the city employees were invited to attend a meeting with the Mayor to discuss the City’s continuing budget shortfall and how the Mayor plans to close the gap.  For non-unionized employees like me, we have to take a 5.2% pay cut.  In addition to the 3.1% pay cut we took last July, that is now a 8.3% cut in pay since this time last year.  Ouch!

After the Mayor finished giving the bad news, he opened it up to questions and comments from the floor.  I was very disappointed at the amount of envy I heard.  Two groups were specifically targeted – the police department, and those who earn over $50000 a year.

Several years ago, when the City had its last budget crisis, the police union got a raise while the non-unionized employees took about a 10 percent pay cut.  Six years later, the non-unionized employees still haven’t forgiven the police union, and strongly expressed their very negative opinion of the police department and their incessant whining.  Heightening the emotions is the fact that the police union publicly denounced the Mayor as a “crook” and an “extortionist” for giving them the choice of 135 layoffs or pay cuts and fewer layoffs.  In other words, he refuses to maintain the status quo, and wants the police to share in the budgetary pains.

I could understand the vitriol aimed at the police department.  I was blown away at the vitriol aimed at those of us who earn more than $50000.  There were several speakers who demanded that those of us who earn more than $50000 a year take a bigger pay cut than those who earn less than $50000, because it is obvious that those of us who earn more than $50000 live extravagant lifestyles and can afford to lose more income.  This class envy crap really pisses me off.  Until this latest pay cut, I earned $61000 a year, which seems like a lot of money.  To most people, it is.  Except that I am supporting 11 people on that $61000!  If I were single and earned $20000 a year I would have more disposable income than I do making $61000.  It pisses me off that just because I earn $61000 a year people assume that I have money to burn.  I blame the Democrats for this class envy crap, as they have convinced lower income people that those of us who earn more are greedy S.O.B.s who want to hoard money and keep them down.  I challenge any of those who think I should be penalized more because I earn more than $50000 a year to support 11 people on $61000.  Go ahead, I dare you!  And since I am so damned rich, I don’t qualify for government assistance for anything, so I pay full price for health care, college tuition for my daughter, and school lunches.  Crap, just the school lunches are $64 a week!

No, I am not cheap when I don’t contribute $5 and $5 there for this, that, and the other.  I am on a tight budget.  I think I am doing a pretty bang-up job providing for my family on one income, so that my children can have a mother at home and don’t have to fend for themselves.  Like my father, I have chosen to provide a loving, stable home for my children, a home in which they have a mother who is there to tend to there needs throughout the day.  To do that, requires a decent salary.  Don’t begrudge me that!

I have figured out that after this latest pay cut, I will be making less money than I did ten years ago.  Yes, we did get change on Election Day in 2008, only it wasn’t change for the better.  I just hope I can hang on until 2012!

Happy Birthday, Brother of Mine!

Monday, January 11th, 2010

I don’t know if he reads or not, but I want to wish my one and only brother a Happy Birthday!  Actually, his birthday was yesterday, but since I didn’t get on the computer yesterday as I typically do not get on the computer in the evenings or on the weekends, as my children nor my time permit it (in defense of my kids, they dont’ permit it because they are on the computer….), I didn’t get a chance to post a Happy Birthday on his birthday.  So, Happy Belated Birthday, Sibling 4!

Digicam Gone Mad!

Monday, January 11th, 2010

For the longest time, I thought I had a stalker.  Time and time again a mysterious red-headed lady would show up in my photographs.  It didn’t matter where I went, or how much older I became, I’d get my photos back from the photo shop, and, BAM! There she was!  Over time it was starting to really creep me out, this red-headed stalker of mine.  Then, a couple of years ago, I figured out who the stalker was – MY THUMB!  It wasn’t a red-headed lady after all!  Here I thought I was important enough to have a stalker, but no, it was just my stupid thumb.

Of course, with the advent of digital photography, no longer would I be surprised by my “stalker” in my photos, right?  Um, no.  I took a bunch of pictures of guardrail for a project I am working on, and when I uploaded the photos to my computer, I was dumbfounded to discover that one of the photos had nothing whatsoever to do with guardrail.

An accidental self-portrait!

An unusual self-portrait!

Some how, some way, I had taken a picture of my nose!  The best that I can surmise, I had left the camera on and put it in my lap, and accidentally snapped the shutter.  I am just glad that I accidentally shot a picture up my nose.  Imagine how embarrassing it would be to be out taking pictures for work, come in and upload, and find out that you accidentally took a picture of yourself while you were sitting on the toilet.

Lesson to be learned — make sure you turn your camera off after you shoot your intended picture!

Oklahoma, Land Of The Wuss

Thursday, January 7th, 2010

Yesterday, they cancelled school for today because they thought we were going to get some really bad weather and some nasty cold.  Well, the front came through, and we didn’t get a bit of snow.  When I looked out the window this morning — IT WAS SUNNY!  As for the cold?  Well, it’s been in the teens and low twenties.  Not too damn bad for January! 

Of course, this is Oklahoma, so they cancelled school for the rest of the week.  Why?  Because it’s too cold!  Yes, because Oklahoma parents are too moronic to make there kids wear coats, hats, and gloves, they have cancelled school, because some poor little heathen child might get frostbite.  Hello?  If you wear friggin’ gloves, a friggin’ coat, and a friggin’ hat, and not a JOHN DEERE one, you have nothing to worry about! 

I was telling Number 1 this morning that I remember a nice sunny day in January like this one when I lived in Illinois, and how I commented to myself on that particular day that it was kind of warm, and how when I looked at a bank marquee, it said the temperature was ZERO.  I don’t recall Illinois ever shutting down because temperatures were in the TEENS!  Jeez!

The True Meaning Of Sportsmanship

Thursday, January 7th, 2010

With all of the negative news lately about football coaches abusing players and obsessed fans who only want to win at all costs, here is a story from my hometown, St. Louis, about a coach and a team who showed us all what sportsmanship is about.  It’s such a heart-warming story, I thought I’d share the link.

http://highschool.rivals.com/content.asp?CID=1036282